← All books

Titus 1

  1. 1:1

    Paul, a servant of God and an apostle of Jesus Christ, for the sake of the faith of God’s chosen ones and the knowledge of the truth which is according to godliness,

    Why can’t Paul just say, “Hey, What’s up?!”

    Paul opens many of his letters with an elaborate greeting rather than a simple introduction. How does Paul's use of these formal, epistolary structures differ from our casual correspondence today, and was this formal approach necessary for establishing his message?

  2. 1:2

    in hope of eternal life, which God, who cannot lie, promised before time began;

    God can’t do bad things like lie, steal, or cheat. But he also can’t do good things like have sex, eat an ice cream cone, or have sex while eating an ice cream cone.

    Paul states that God "cannot lie," pointing to a divine limitation. In philosophical theology, what does it mean to say there are things an omnipotent God cannot do, and how does that shape our understanding of divine nature?

  3. 1:3

    but in his own time revealed his word in the message with which I was entrusted according to the commandment of God our Savior;

    Speaking of God’s timing, you wonder what year it was on God’s calendar when he decided the best word-revelation strategy was to mug a Pharisee on a dirt road to Damascus.

    This verse mentions that God revealed his word "in his own time." How does grappling with the mystery of divine timing change our perspective on historical events?

  4. 1:4

    to Titus, my true child in our common faith: Grace, mercy, and peace from God the Father and the Lord Jesus Christ our Savior.

    Titus wasn’t Paul’s real kid. So in the Old Testament, every patriarch needed a biological heir. In the New Testament, all the apostles are asexual.

    Paul calls Titus his "true child in our common faith," which indicates a shift from the Old Testament focus on biological lineage to the New Testament focus on spiritual inheritance. What are the implications of defining family and legacy through shared faith rather than DNA?

  5. 1:5

    I left you in Crete for this reason, so that you would put in order what was left to be done and appoint elders in every city, as I directed you.

    The reason Paul appointed elders is because the only way to believe his message is to have a senior moment.

    Paul commands Titus to establish a network of elders across every city in Crete. What does this push toward formal leadership suggest about the evolving hierarchy and institutionalization of the early church?

  6. 1:6

    An elder must be blameless, faithful to his wife, a man whose children are believers and not accused of loose or unruly behavior.

    So, no guy ever.

    Paul sets high moral and domestic standards for local leaders. How were early Christian communities meant to evaluate a leader’s spiritual maturity based on their private household life?

  7. 1:7

    For the overseer, as God’s steward, must be blameless, not overbearing, not easily angered, not given to wine, not violent, not greedy for dishonest gain.

    So, not a man’s man.

    Paul lists traits to avoid in an overseer—such as being arrogant, quick-tempered, or greedy. Why were personal temperament and financial integrity considered mandatory prerequisites for spiritual oversight?

  8. 1:8

    Rather he must be hospitable, a lover of good, sober minded, fair, holy, self-controlled,

    So, low T.

    Paul counters negative traits with virtues like hospitality, fairness, and self-control. Are these virtues easier or more natural for older men to exemplify in comparison to younger men?

  9. 1:9

    holding to the faithful word of the teaching, so that he may be able to exhort with sound doctrine and refute those who contradict it.

    Strict rules, doctrine, and governance policies—or as it's better known, going from Jesus to everything Jesus hated.

    Paul emphasizes holding firmly to official teaching, enforcing sound doctrine, and setting up strict governance. Is this push toward institutionalizing the church the same kind of rigid religious structures and rules Jesus spoke against?

  10. 1:10

    For there are also many unruly people, vain talkers and deceivers, especially those of the circumcision group.

    Paul called these guys Dicks.

    Paul warns against rebellious people, talkers, and deceivers, especially those of "the circumcision group." What was the core conflict between Paul’s Gospel and the insistence on Jewish ceremonial rites for Gentile believers?

  11. 1:11

    They must be stopped, since they are disrupting whole households by teaching what they ought not to teach for the sake of dishonest gain.

    These Dicks sound just like televangelists, cable news, and crypto bros.

    Paul warns that certain leaders are disrupting entire households by teaching for dishonest gain. Where, if at all, do we see these same patterns of spiritual exploitation playing out in modern religious or cultural life today?

  12. 1:12

    It was one of them, their very own prophet, who said, “Cretans are always liars, evil beasts, and idle gluttons.”

    Paul quotes Greek poetry in Holy Scripture not to be highbrow intellectual, but to call his opponents lying beasts and lazy gluttons. Oddly, he forgot fatty fatsos.

    Paul quotes the Cretan philosopher Epimenides saying, "Cretans are always liars, evil beasts, lazy gluttons." What does Paul’s use of pagan secular literature in a biblical letter reveal about his educational background and rhetorical strategy?

  13. 1:13

    This testimony is true. For this cause, rebuke them sharply, so that they may become sound in the faith,

    Paul affirms it’s true: All Cretans are evil beasts. Next up, he’ll explain why all Mexicans are drug dealers.

    Paul validates the harsh assessment of Cretans. What does Paul’s immediate willingness to embrace this sweeping regional stereotype suggest about cultural profiling in the ancient world, and how should readers evaluate his reaction?

  14. 1:14

    not paying attention to Jewish fables or to commandments of those who turn away from the truth.

    Paul just cited a random Greek pagan as divine truth, then tells us to reject Jewish fables like Noah's Ark. Next up, he'll explain how the plan of salvation was written by Socrates.

    Paul cautions against "Jewish fables" while leaning on Greek philosophical ideas in his writings. What did Paul likely consider a "Jewish fable," and how should readers navigate his blending Greek modes of thought into his own thinking?

  15. 1:15

    To the pure, all things are pure; but to those who are defiled and unbelieving, nothing is pure; but both their mind and their conscience are defiled.

    To the pure, all things are pure. To the impure, the “laying on of hands” is what you do in the back pew.

    Paul declares, "To the pure, all things are pure," but to the defiled, nothing is pure. How do mind and conscience shape a person’s perception of morality and spiritual purity?

  16. 1:16

    They profess to know God, but by their deeds they deny him; they are abominable, disobedient, and unfit for any good work.

    Anyone can say they know God. But only real Christians back it up with the good deeds of murdering infidels.

    Paul warns that some people profess to know God, but deny him by their actions. What is the relationship between verbal confession and daily lifestyle as evidence of genuine faith?