← All books

Exodus 3

  1. 3:1

    Now Moses was keeping the flock of his father-in-law Jethro, the priest of Midian; he led the flock to the back of the wilderness and came to Horeb, the mountain of God.

    Moses went from being a prince of Egypt to working for his father-in-law in the off-grid sheep-walking business.

    Moses goes from being raised as Egyptian royalty to tending sheep in the wilderness for his father-in-law. How does this complete shift in status and environment prepare him for his eventual role leading Israel?

  2. 3:2

    Then the angel of the Lord appeared to him in a flame of fire out of the middle of a bush. He looked, and the bush burned with fire, but the bush was not consumed.

    In addition to all this other accomplishments, Moses also invented Smore’s.

    The angel of the Lord appears in a burning bush that is not consumed by the fire. What is the significance of using a persistent, unquenchable flame to grab Moses' attention?

  3. 3:3

    Moses said, “I will turn aside and see this great sight—why the bush is not burned up.”

    The burning bush wasn’t originally meant for Moses. Yahweh was just field-testing his new anti-ash formula for Hell.

    Moses notices the peculiar nature of the bush and decides to step aside to investigate. What does his natural curiosity in this moment reveal about his character?

  4. 3:4

    When the Lord saw that he came over to see, God called to him from the midst of the bush, “Moses! Moses!” He said, “Here I am.”

    Moses only came over to see if the bush was smokable.

    God calls out to Moses by name twice from within the bush only after seeing that he turned to look. What does this initial interaction suggest about how divine revelation begins in the narrative?

  5. 3:5

    He said, “Don’t come any closer. Take off your sandals, for the place you are standing is holy ground.”

    Then added: “But you can leave on your tube socks—the sand is absolute lava.”

    Moses is instructed to remove his sandals because he is standing on holy ground. How does the act of removing footwear symbolize reverence and boundaries in the presence of the divine?

  6. 3:6

    Moreover he said, “I am the God of your father, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob.” Moses hid his face because he was afraid to look at God.

    Moses found it difficult to look at God because Yahweh had a piece of spinach stuck in his front teeth.

    God introduces himself as the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, prompting Moses to hide his face. Why does linking this divine encounter to his ancestral lineage evoke such immediate fear in Moses?

  7. 3:7

    Then the Lord said, “I have surely seen the affliction of my people in Egypt, and I have heard their cry because of their taskmasters, for I know their sorrows.

    Moses is minding his own business on a hillside when a random bush starts lecturing him on cross-continental human rights abuses—when Moses was just looking for a brochure on rotational grazing.

    God suddenly reveals to Moses that he has seen and heard the deep suffering of the Israelites back in Egypt. How might hearing this unexpected report impact a man who had settled into a quiet life as a shepherd far away from those problems?

  8. 3:8

    I have come down to deliver them out of the hand of the Egyptians, and to bring them up out of that land to a good and large land, to a land flowing with milk and honey—the land of the Canaanites, Hittites, Amorites, Perizzites, Hivites, and the Jebusites.

    The problem with a good and large land is it’s too big for your walk-behind mower.

    God describes the promised land as vast, fertile, and overflowing with abundance—yet it is already inhabited by six distinct nations. What potential challenges would this "good and large land" present to a population of newly freed slaves with no military experience?

  9. 3:9

    The cry of the Israelites has come to me. I have also seen how the Egyptians oppress them.

    God heard their cry, but dismissed it as regular whining, until he did a site visit and realized the Egyptians were oppressing them to build those insanely gorgeous monuments.

    God reiterates that he has witnessed both the cries of the Israelites and the oppression of the Egyptians. What is the purpose of emphasizing this dual observation right before giving Moses his assignment?

  10. 3:10

    So come, I will send you to Pharaoh to bring my people Israel out of Egypt.”

    God: I have seen the affliction of my people. So, anyway, go save them for me.

    God directly commissions Moses to go before Pharaoh and bring the Israelites out of Egypt. How does this shift the responsibility of the rescue from a purely divine act to a human-led mission?

  11. 3:11

    Moses said to God, “Who am I that I should go to Pharaoh and bring the Israelites out of Egypt?”

    That’s a good question. Moses’s current resume consists of “wanted for murder” and “goat whisperer.” Surely, God has a better option—like a Hebrew influencer with a Nile league law degree.

    Moses responds to God's commission with a hesitant question: "Who am I?" What does this reaction indicate about how Moses views his own qualifications at this point in his life?

  12. 3:12

    He said, “I will be with you. This will be the sign for you that it is I who have sent you: When you have brought the people out of Egypt, you shall worship God on this mountain.”

    That’s like God saying to you: “I promise to be with you on your mission trip to Ghana, and this is the sign I’ll be with you: When you get back, you’ll attend an outdoor praise and worship service.”

    God promises his presence and offers a sign that will only be fulfilled after the mission succeeds back on the mountain. What kind of trust does a future-oriented sign demand from Moses in the present?

  13. 3:13

    Moses said to God, “If I come to the Israelites and tell them, ‘The God of your fathers has sent me to you,’ and they ask me, ‘What is his name?’ what should I tell them?”

    Moses knows the Israelites will treat him like a total fraud if he shows up claiming to be sent by um, you know, that God from earlier.

    Moses asks God what name he should give when the Israelites inquire who sent him. Why wouldn't a Hebrew who grew up among his people—or at least knew his heritage—already know the name of the God of his ancestors?

  14. 3:14

    God said to Moses, “I AM WHO I AM,” and he said, “You shall tell the Israelites this: ‘I AM has sent me to you.’”

    So Moses will have to explain to two million people that they are being rescued by a grammatical tautology.

    God responds with the enigmatic phrase "I AM WHO I AM." What does this unique self-identification express about God's nature and authority?

  15. 3:15

    God also said to Moses, “You shall tell the Israelites this, ‘The Lord, the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, has sent me to you.’ This is my name forever, and this is my title for all generations.

    In Hebrew, God’s name is YHWH, no vowels. So God’s Slovakian.

    God establishes his name YHWH alongside his title as the God of their fathers for all generations. How does this balance his eternal existence with his historical relationship to Israel?

  16. 3:16

    Go and gather the elders of Israel together and tell them, ‘The Lord, the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, has appeared to me and said, “I have watched over you and have seen what has been done to you in Egypt.

    You have to wonder if life in Egypt is all that bad if the elders of Israel have time for a long lunch meeting with a shepherd from Midian.

    Moses is told to gather the elders of Israel and announce that God has appeared to him. What challenges might a fugitive shepherd face when attempting to rally established community leaders?

  17. 3:17

    And I have promised I will bring you up out of your misery in Egypt into the land of the Canaanite, the Hittite, the Amorite, the Perizzite, the Hivite, and the Jebusite—a land flowing with milk and honey.”’

    A land flowing with milk and honey sounds okay, but not as nice as a land flowing with a bottomless mimosa bar.

    God repeats the promise of leading them out of misery into a land flowing with milk and honey. What impact would this vivid imagery of abundance have on a people living under harsh physical labor?

  18. 3:18

    They will listen to your voice. Then you and the elders of Israel will go to the king of Egypt and you will tell him, ‘The Lord, the God of the Hebrews, has met with us. Now please let us go three days’ journey into the wilderness so we may sacrifice to the Lord our God.’

    This is like submitting a PTO request for a three-day religious holiday, knowing full well you’re turning off your phone, moving across the border, and never coming back to your office in Cairo.

    Moses is instructed to request a three-day journey into the wilderness for religious sacrifices. Why framing the initial request to Pharaoh as a temporary worship retreat rather than a permanent escape?

  19. 3:19

    I know, however, that the king of Egypt won’t let you go unless compelled by a mighty hand.

    Right, no slave master is approving a three-day religious retreat unless you promise to make up the bricks in advance.

    God warns Moses in advance that the king of Egypt will not let them go unless forced by a mighty hand. How does this warning shape Moses' expectations for his upcoming negotiations?

  20. 3:20

    So I will stretch out my hand and strike Egypt with all my wonders which I will do among them, and after that he will let you go.

    God could easily stretch out his hand to soften the hearts and minds of the Egyptians. Instead of stretching out his hand to punch them in the face with dead firstborns.

    God announces that he will unleash wonders and strike Egypt to force Pharaoh’s hand. Considering that God could simply soften Pharaoh’s heart to achieve a peaceful release, what does this choice to instead use devastating plagues reveal about the complex portrayal of God in this story?

  21. 3:21

    I will give this people favor in the sight of the Egyptians, such that when you go, you will not go empty-handed.

    God referring to Israel as “this people” has huge disappointed-parent energy—like he’s blaming them for getting enslaved in the first place because they wouldn’t use a condom.

    The rapid growth of the Israelites' population is precisely what led the Egyptians to enslave them in the first place out of fear. Given their foundational significance in his plan, why does God refer to Israel using the somewhat distant phrase "this people" when describing how he will grant them favor?

  22. 3:22

    Every woman will ask her neighbor, and any woman living in the neighbor’s house, for jewels of silver and gold and clothing; and you will put them on your sons and daughters. Thus you will plunder the Egyptians.”

    This explains Moses’s official campaign tagline: Let freedom bling!

    The Israelites are instructed to ask their Egyptian neighbors for gold, silver, and fine clothing on their way out. What are readers meant to make of this bizarre detail—where a fleeing population of slaves essentially enriches themselves at the expense of their oppressors?